update plotting code

[ml_measurement_error_public.git] / simulations / 02_indep_differential.R

diff --git a/simulations/02_indep_differential.R b/simulations/02_indep_differential.R
index bcfad65f8dc63659fd306977fe546ac40d16f660..9c33be717f0a2169c9eb2bd19d35204ea0a3fa53 100644 (file)
--- a/simulations/02_indep_differential.R
+++ b/simulations/02_indep_differential.R
@@ -31,11 +31,11 @@ source("simulation_base.R")
 
 ## one way to do it is by adding correlation to x.obs and y that isn't in w.
 ## in other words, the model is missing an important feature of x.obs that's related to y.
 
 ## one way to do it is by adding correlation to x.obs and y that isn't in w.
 ## in other words, the model is missing an important feature of x.obs that's related to y.

-simulate_data <- function(N, m, B0, Bxy, Bzx, Bzy, seed, y_explained_variance=0.025, prediction_accuracy=0.73, y_bias=-0.8,accuracy_imbalance_difference=0.3){
+simulate_data <- function(N, m, B0, Bxy, Bzx, Bzy, seed, y_explained_variance=0.025, prediction_accuracy=0.73, y_bias=-0.8,z_bias=0,Px=0.5,accuracy_imbalance_difference=0.3){

     set.seed(seed)
     # make w and y dependent
     set.seed(seed)
     # make w and y dependent

-    z <- rbinom(N, 1, plogis(qlogis(0.5)))
-    x <- rbinom(N, 1, plogis(Bzx * z + qlogis(0.5)))
+    z <- rnorm(N,sd=0.5)
+    x <- rbinom(N, 1, plogis(Bzx * z + qlogis(Px)))

 
     y.var.epsilon <- (var(Bzy * z) + var(Bxy *x) + 2*cov(Bzy*z,Bxy*x)) * ((1-y_explained_variance)/y_explained_variance)
     y.epsilon <- rnorm(N, sd = sqrt(y.var.epsilon))
 
     y.var.epsilon <- (var(Bzy * z) + var(Bxy *x) + 2*cov(Bzy*z,Bxy*x)) * ((1-y_explained_variance)/y_explained_variance)
     y.epsilon <- rnorm(N, sd = sqrt(y.var.epsilon))


@@ -104,9 +104,10 @@ simulate_data <- function(N, m, B0, Bxy, Bzx, Bzy, seed, y_explained_variance=0.
     ## print(mean(df[z==1]$x == df[z==1]$w_pred))
     ## print(mean(df$w_pred == df$x))
 
     ## print(mean(df[z==1]$x == df[z==1]$w_pred))
     ## print(mean(df$w_pred == df$x))
 

+

     resids <- resid(lm(y~x + z))
     resids <- resid(lm(y~x + z))

-    odds.x1 <- qlogis(prediction_accuracy) + y_bias*qlogis(pnorm(resids[x==1]))
-    odds.x0 <- qlogis(prediction_accuracy,lower.tail=F) + y_bias*qlogis(pnorm(resids[x==0]))
+    odds.x1 <- qlogis(prediction_accuracy) + y_bias*qlogis(pnorm(resids[x==1])) + z_bias * qlogis(pnorm(z[x==1],sd(z)))
+    odds.x0 <- qlogis(prediction_accuracy,lower.tail=F) + y_bias*qlogis(pnorm(resids[x==0])) + z_bias * qlogis(pnorm(z[x==0],sd(z)))

 
     ## acc.x0 <- p.correct[df[,x==0]]
     ## acc.x1 <- p.correct[df[,x==1]]
 
     ## acc.x0 <- p.correct[df[,x==0]]
     ## acc.x1 <- p.correct[df[,x==1]]


@@ -129,19 +130,22 @@ parser <- add_argument(parser, "--m", default=500, help="m the number of ground
 parser <- add_argument(parser, "--seed", default=51, help='seed for the rng')
 parser <- add_argument(parser, "--outfile", help='output file', default='example_2.feather')
 parser <- add_argument(parser, "--y_explained_variance", help='what proportion of the variance of y can be explained?', default=0.1)
 parser <- add_argument(parser, "--seed", default=51, help='seed for the rng')
 parser <- add_argument(parser, "--outfile", help='output file', default='example_2.feather')
 parser <- add_argument(parser, "--y_explained_variance", help='what proportion of the variance of y can be explained?', default=0.1)

-parser <- add_argument(parser, "--prediction_accuracy", help='how accurate is the predictive model?', default=0.8)
+parser <- add_argument(parser, "--prediction_accuracy", help='how accurate is the predictive model?', default=0.75)

 parser <- add_argument(parser, "--accuracy_imbalance_difference", help='how much more accurate is the predictive model for one class than the other?', default=0.3)
 parser <- add_argument(parser, "--Bzx", help='Effect of z on x', default=0.3)
 parser <- add_argument(parser, "--Bzy", help='Effect of z on y', default=-0.3)
 parser <- add_argument(parser, "--Bxy", help='Effect of z on y', default=0.3)
 parser <- add_argument(parser, "--outcome_formula", help='formula for the outcome variable', default="y~x+z")
 parser <- add_argument(parser, "--proxy_formula", help='formula for the proxy variable', default="w_pred~y*z*x")
 parser <- add_argument(parser, "--accuracy_imbalance_difference", help='how much more accurate is the predictive model for one class than the other?', default=0.3)
 parser <- add_argument(parser, "--Bzx", help='Effect of z on x', default=0.3)
 parser <- add_argument(parser, "--Bzy", help='Effect of z on y', default=-0.3)
 parser <- add_argument(parser, "--Bxy", help='Effect of z on y', default=0.3)
 parser <- add_argument(parser, "--outcome_formula", help='formula for the outcome variable', default="y~x+z")
 parser <- add_argument(parser, "--proxy_formula", help='formula for the proxy variable', default="w_pred~y*z*x")

-parser <- add_argument(parser, "--y_bias", help='coefficient of y on the probability a classification is correct', default=-1)
+parser <- add_argument(parser, "--y_bias", help='coefficient of y on the probability a classification is correct', default=-0.5)
+parser <- add_argument(parser, "--z_bias", help='coefficient of z on the probability a classification is correct', default=0)

 parser <- add_argument(parser, "--truth_formula", help='formula for the true variable', default="x~z")
 parser <- add_argument(parser, "--truth_formula", help='formula for the true variable', default="x~z")

-
+parser <- add_argument(parser, "--Px", help='base rate of x', default=0.5)
+parser <- add_argument(parser, "--confint_method", help='method for approximating confidence intervals', default='quad')

 args <- parse_args(parser)
 
 B0 <- 0
 args <- parse_args(parser)
 
 B0 <- 0

+Px <- args$Px

 Bxy <- args$Bxy
 Bzy <- args$Bzy
 Bzx <- args$Bzx
 Bxy <- args$Bxy
 Bzy <- args$Bzy
 Bzx <- args$Bzx


@@ -155,9 +159,9 @@ if(args$m < args$N){
     ## pc.df <- pc(suffStat=list(C=cor(df.pc),n=nrow(df.pc)),indepTest=gaussCItest,labels=names(df.pc),alpha=0.05)
     ## plot(pc.df)
 
     ## pc.df <- pc(suffStat=list(C=cor(df.pc),n=nrow(df.pc)),indepTest=gaussCItest,labels=names(df.pc),alpha=0.05)
     ## plot(pc.df)
 

-    result <- list('N'=args$N,'m'=args$m,'B0'=B0,'Bxy'=Bxy, Bzx=args$Bzx, 'Bzy'=Bzy, 'seed'=args$seed, 'y_explained_variance'=args$y_explained_variance, 'prediction_accuracy'=args$prediction_accuracy, 'accuracy_imbalance_difference'=args$accuracy_imbalance_difference, 'y_bias'=args$y_bias,'outcome_formula'=args$outcome_formula, 'proxy_formula'=args$proxy_formula,truth_formula=args$truth_formula, error='')
+    result <- list('N'=args$N,'m'=args$m,'B0'=B0,'Bxy'=Bxy, 'Bzx'=args$Bzx, 'Bzy'=Bzy, 'Px'=Px, 'seed'=args$seed, 'y_explained_variance'=args$y_explained_variance, 'prediction_accuracy'=args$prediction_accuracy, 'accuracy_imbalance_difference'=args$accuracy_imbalance_difference, 'y_bias'=args$y_bias,'outcome_formula'=args$outcome_formula, 'proxy_formula'=args$proxy_formula,truth_formula=args$truth_formula, confint_method=args$confint_method, error='')

 
 

-    outline <- run_simulation(df, result, outcome_formula=as.formula(args$outcome_formula), proxy_formula=as.formula(args$proxy_formula), truth_formula=as.formula(args$truth_formula))
+    outline <- run_simulation(df, result, outcome_formula=as.formula(args$outcome_formula), proxy_formula=as.formula(args$proxy_formula), truth_formula=as.formula(args$truth_formula),confint_method=args$confint_method)

     
    
  outfile_lock <- lock(paste0(args$outfile, '_lock'),exclusive=TRUE)
     
    
  outfile_lock <- lock(paste0(args$outfile, '_lock'),exclusive=TRUE)