git-annex in nathante@n3246:/gscratch/comdata/users/nathante/ml_measurement_error_public

[ml_measurement_error_public.git] / simulations / 02_indep_differential.R

diff --git a/simulations/02_indep_differential.R b/simulations/02_indep_differential.R
index bcfad65f8dc63659fd306977fe546ac40d16f660..6e2732f43bbdbdf94c4e9debbafc9b566cae6dab 100644 (file)
--- a/simulations/02_indep_differential.R
+++ b/simulations/02_indep_differential.R
@@ -31,11 +31,11 @@ source("simulation_base.R")
 
 ## one way to do it is by adding correlation to x.obs and y that isn't in w.
 ## in other words, the model is missing an important feature of x.obs that's related to y.
 
 ## one way to do it is by adding correlation to x.obs and y that isn't in w.
 ## in other words, the model is missing an important feature of x.obs that's related to y.

-simulate_data <- function(N, m, B0, Bxy, Bzx, Bzy, seed, y_explained_variance=0.025, prediction_accuracy=0.73, y_bias=-0.8,accuracy_imbalance_difference=0.3){
+simulate_data <- function(N, m, B0, Bxy, Bzx, Bzy, seed, y_explained_variance=0.025, prediction_accuracy=0.73, y_bias=-0.8,z_bias=0,accuracy_imbalance_difference=0.3){

     set.seed(seed)
     # make w and y dependent
     set.seed(seed)
     # make w and y dependent

-    z <- rbinom(N, 1, plogis(qlogis(0.5)))
-    x <- rbinom(N, 1, plogis(Bzx * z + qlogis(0.5)))
+    z <- rnorm(N,sd=0.5)
+    x <- rbinom(N, 1, plogis(Bzx * z))

 
     y.var.epsilon <- (var(Bzy * z) + var(Bxy *x) + 2*cov(Bzy*z,Bxy*x)) * ((1-y_explained_variance)/y_explained_variance)
     y.epsilon <- rnorm(N, sd = sqrt(y.var.epsilon))
 
     y.var.epsilon <- (var(Bzy * z) + var(Bxy *x) + 2*cov(Bzy*z,Bxy*x)) * ((1-y_explained_variance)/y_explained_variance)
     y.epsilon <- rnorm(N, sd = sqrt(y.var.epsilon))


@@ -105,8 +105,8 @@ simulate_data <- function(N, m, B0, Bxy, Bzx, Bzy, seed, y_explained_variance=0.
     ## print(mean(df$w_pred == df$x))
 
     resids <- resid(lm(y~x + z))
     ## print(mean(df$w_pred == df$x))
 
     resids <- resid(lm(y~x + z))

-    odds.x1 <- qlogis(prediction_accuracy) + y_bias*qlogis(pnorm(resids[x==1]))
-    odds.x0 <- qlogis(prediction_accuracy,lower.tail=F) + y_bias*qlogis(pnorm(resids[x==0]))
+    odds.x1 <- qlogis(prediction_accuracy) + y_bias*qlogis(pnorm(resids[x==1])) + z_bias * qlogis(pnorm(z,sd(z)))
+    odds.x0 <- qlogis(prediction_accuracy,lower.tail=F) + y_bias*qlogis(pnorm(resids[x==0])) + z_bias * qlogis(pnorm(z,sd(z)))

 
     ## acc.x0 <- p.correct[df[,x==0]]
     ## acc.x1 <- p.correct[df[,x==1]]
 
     ## acc.x0 <- p.correct[df[,x==0]]
     ## acc.x1 <- p.correct[df[,x==1]]


@@ -129,14 +129,15 @@ parser <- add_argument(parser, "--m", default=500, help="m the number of ground
 parser <- add_argument(parser, "--seed", default=51, help='seed for the rng')
 parser <- add_argument(parser, "--outfile", help='output file', default='example_2.feather')
 parser <- add_argument(parser, "--y_explained_variance", help='what proportion of the variance of y can be explained?', default=0.1)
 parser <- add_argument(parser, "--seed", default=51, help='seed for the rng')
 parser <- add_argument(parser, "--outfile", help='output file', default='example_2.feather')
 parser <- add_argument(parser, "--y_explained_variance", help='what proportion of the variance of y can be explained?', default=0.1)

-parser <- add_argument(parser, "--prediction_accuracy", help='how accurate is the predictive model?', default=0.8)
+parser <- add_argument(parser, "--prediction_accuracy", help='how accurate is the predictive model?', default=0.75)

 parser <- add_argument(parser, "--accuracy_imbalance_difference", help='how much more accurate is the predictive model for one class than the other?', default=0.3)
 parser <- add_argument(parser, "--Bzx", help='Effect of z on x', default=0.3)
 parser <- add_argument(parser, "--Bzy", help='Effect of z on y', default=-0.3)
 parser <- add_argument(parser, "--Bxy", help='Effect of z on y', default=0.3)
 parser <- add_argument(parser, "--outcome_formula", help='formula for the outcome variable', default="y~x+z")
 parser <- add_argument(parser, "--proxy_formula", help='formula for the proxy variable', default="w_pred~y*z*x")
 parser <- add_argument(parser, "--accuracy_imbalance_difference", help='how much more accurate is the predictive model for one class than the other?', default=0.3)
 parser <- add_argument(parser, "--Bzx", help='Effect of z on x', default=0.3)
 parser <- add_argument(parser, "--Bzy", help='Effect of z on y', default=-0.3)
 parser <- add_argument(parser, "--Bxy", help='Effect of z on y', default=0.3)
 parser <- add_argument(parser, "--outcome_formula", help='formula for the outcome variable', default="y~x+z")
 parser <- add_argument(parser, "--proxy_formula", help='formula for the proxy variable', default="w_pred~y*z*x")

-parser <- add_argument(parser, "--y_bias", help='coefficient of y on the probability a classification is correct', default=-1)
+parser <- add_argument(parser, "--y_bias", help='coefficient of y on the probability a classification is correct', default=-0.5)
+parser <- add_argument(parser, "--z_bias", help='coefficient of z on the probability a classification is correct', default=0)

 parser <- add_argument(parser, "--truth_formula", help='formula for the true variable', default="x~z")
 
 args <- parse_args(parser)
 parser <- add_argument(parser, "--truth_formula", help='formula for the true variable', default="x~z")
 
 args <- parse_args(parser)