+## This uses the pseudolikelihood approach from Carroll page 349.
+## assumes MAR
+## assumes differential error, but that only depends on Y
+## inefficient, because pseudolikelihood
+
+## This uses the pseudo-likelihood approach from Carroll page 346.
+my.pseudo.mle <- function(df){
+ p1.est <- mean(df[w_pred==1]$y.obs==1,na.rm=T)
+ p0.est <- mean(df[w_pred==0]$y.obs==0,na.rm=T)
+
+ nll <- function(B0, Bxy, Bzy){
+
+ pw <- vector(mode='numeric',length=nrow(df))
+ dfw1 <- df[w_pred==1]
+ dfw0 <- df[w_pred==0]
+ pw[df$w_pred==1] <- plogis(B0 + Bxy * dfw1$x + Bzy * dfw1$z, log=T)
+ pw[df$w_pred==0] <- plogis(B0 + Bxy * dfw0$x + Bzy * dfw0$z, lower.tail=FALSE, log=T)
+
+ probs <- colLogSumExps(rbind(log(1 - p0.est), log(p1.est + p0.est - 1) + pw))
+ return(-1*sum(probs))
+ }
+
+ mlefit <- mle2(minuslogl = nll, start = list(B0=0.0, Bxy=0.0, Bzy=0.0), control=list(maxit=1e6),method='L-BFGS-B')
+ return(mlefit)
+
+}
+
+
+## model from Zhang's arxiv paper, with predictions for y
+## Zhang got this model from Hausman 1998
+### I think this is actually eqivalent to the pseudo.mle method
+zhang.mle.iv <- function(df){
+ nll <- function(B0=0, Bxy=0, Bzy=0, sigma_y=0.1, ppv=0.9, npv=0.9){
+ df.obs <- df[!is.na(x.obs)]
+ df.unobs <- df[is.na(x.obs)]
+
+ ## fpr = 1 - TNR
+ ### Problem: accounting for uncertainty in ppv / npv
+
+ ll.w1x1.obs <- with(df.obs[(w_pred==1)], dbinom(x.obs,size=1,prob=ppv,log=T))
+ ll.w0x0.obs <- with(df.obs[(w_pred==0)], dbinom(1-x.obs,size=1,prob=npv,log=T))
+
+ ## fnr = 1 - TPR
+ ll.y.obs <- with(df.obs, dnorm(y, B0 + Bxy * x + Bzy * z, sd=sigma_y,log=T))
+ ll <- sum(ll.y.obs)
+ ll <- ll + sum(ll.w1x1.obs) + sum(ll.w0x0.obs)
+
+ # unobserved case; integrate out x
+ ll.x.1 <- with(df.unobs, dnorm(y, B0 + Bxy + Bzy * z, sd = sigma_y, log=T))
+ ll.x.0 <- with(df.unobs, dnorm(y, B0 + Bzy * z, sd = sigma_y,log=T))
+
+ ## case x == 1
+ lls.x.1 <- colLogSumExps(rbind(log(ppv) + ll.x.1, log(1-ppv) + ll.x.0))
+
+ ## case x == 0
+ lls.x.0 <- colLogSumExps(rbind(log(1-npv) + ll.x.1, log(npv) + ll.x.0))
+
+ lls <- colLogSumExps(rbind(lls.x.1, lls.x.0))
+ ll <- ll + sum(lls)
+ return(-ll)
+ }
+ mlefit <- mle2(minuslogl = nll, control=list(maxit=1e6), lower=list(sigma_y=0.0001, B0=-Inf, Bxy=-Inf, Bzy=-Inf,ppv=0.00001, npv=0.00001),
+ upper=list(sigma_y=Inf, B0=Inf, Bxy=Inf, Bzy=Inf, ppv=0.99999,npv=0.99999),method='L-BFGS-B')
+ return(mlefit)
+}
+
+## this is equivalent to the pseudo-liklihood model from Carolla
+zhang.mle.dv <- function(df){
+
+ nll <- function(B0=0, Bxy=0, Bzy=0, ppv=0.9, npv=0.9){
+ df.obs <- df[!is.na(y.obs)]
+
+ ## fpr = 1 - TNR
+ ll.w0y0 <- with(df.obs[y.obs==0],dbinom(1-w_pred,1,npv,log=TRUE))
+ ll.w1y1 <- with(df.obs[y.obs==1],dbinom(w_pred,1,ppv,log=TRUE))
+
+ # observed case
+ ll.y.obs <- vector(mode='numeric', length=nrow(df.obs))
+ ll.y.obs[df.obs$y.obs==1] <- with(df.obs[y.obs==1], plogis(B0 + Bxy * x + Bzy * z,log=T))
+ ll.y.obs[df.obs$y.obs==0] <- with(df.obs[y.obs==0], plogis(B0 + Bxy * x + Bzy * z,log=T,lower.tail=FALSE))
+
+ ll <- sum(ll.y.obs) + sum(ll.w0y0) + sum(ll.w1y1)
+
+ # unobserved case; integrate out y
+ ## case y = 1
+ ll.y.1 <- vector(mode='numeric', length=nrow(df))
+ pi.y.1 <- with(df,plogis(B0 + Bxy * x + Bzy*z, log=T))
+ ## P(w=1| y=1)P(y=1) + P(w=0|y=1)P(y=1) = P(w=1,y=1) + P(w=0,y=1)
+ lls.y.1 <- colLogSumExps(rbind(log(ppv) + pi.y.1, log(1-ppv) + pi.y.1))
+
+ ## case y = 0
+ ll.y.0 <- vector(mode='numeric', length=nrow(df))
+ pi.y.0 <- with(df,plogis(B0 + Bxy * x + Bzy*z, log=T,lower.tail=FALSE))
+
+ ## P(w=1 | y=0)P(y=0) + P(w=0|y=0)P(y=0) = P(w=1,y=0) + P(w=0,y=0)
+ lls.y.0 <- colLogSumExps(rbind(log(npv) + pi.y.0, log(1-npv) + pi.y.0))
+
+ lls <- colLogSumExps(rbind(lls.y.1, lls.y.0))
+ ll <- ll + sum(lls)
+ return(-ll)
+ }
+ mlefit <- mle2(minuslogl = nll, control=list(maxit=1e6),method='L-BFGS-B',lower=list(B0=-Inf, Bxy=-Inf, Bzy=-Inf, ppv=0.001,npv=0.001),
+ upper=list(B0=Inf, Bxy=Inf, Bzy=Inf,ppv=0.999,npv=0.999))
+ return(mlefit)
+}
+
+## This uses the likelihood approach from Carroll page 353.
+## assumes that we have a good measurement error model
+my.mle <- function(df){
+
+ ## liklihood for observed responses
+ nll <- function(B0, Bxy, Bzy, gamma0, gamma_y, gamma_z, gamma_yz){
+ df.obs <- df[!is.na(y.obs)]
+ yobs0 <- df.obs$y==0
+ yobs1 <- df.obs$y==1
+ p.y.obs <- vector(mode='numeric', length=nrow(df.obs))
+
+ p.y.obs[yobs1] <- plogis(B0 + Bxy * df.obs[yobs1]$x + Bzy*df.obs[yobs1]$z,log=T)
+ p.y.obs[yobs0] <- plogis(B0 + Bxy * df.obs[yobs0]$x + Bzy*df.obs[yobs0]$z,lower.tail=FALSE,log=T)
+
+ wobs0 <- df.obs$w_pred==0
+ wobs1 <- df.obs$w_pred==1
+ p.w.obs <- vector(mode='numeric', length=nrow(df.obs))
+
+ p.w.obs[wobs1] <- plogis(gamma0 + gamma_y * df.obs[wobs1]$y + gamma_z*df.obs[wobs1]$z + df.obs[wobs1]$z*df.obs[wobs1]$y* gamma_yz, log=T)
+ p.w.obs[wobs0] <- plogis(gamma0 + gamma_y * df.obs[wobs0]$y + gamma_z*df.obs[wobs0]$z + df.obs[wobs0]$z*df.obs[wobs0]$y* gamma_yz, lower.tail=FALSE, log=T)
+
+ p.obs <- p.w.obs + p.y.obs
+
+ df.unobs <- df[is.na(y.obs)]
+
+ p.unobs.0 <- vector(mode='numeric',length=nrow(df.unobs))
+ p.unobs.1 <- vector(mode='numeric',length=nrow(df.unobs))
+
+ wunobs.0 <- df.unobs$w_pred == 0
+ wunobs.1 <- df.unobs$w_pred == 1
+
+ p.unobs.0[wunobs.1] <- plogis(B0 + Bxy * df.unobs[wunobs.1]$x + Bzy*df.unobs[wunobs.1]$z, log=T) + plogis(gamma0 + gamma_y + gamma_z*df.unobs[wunobs.1]$z + df.unobs[wunobs.1]$z*gamma_yz, log=T)
+
+ p.unobs.0[wunobs.0] <- plogis(B0 + Bxy * df.unobs[wunobs.0]$x + Bzy*df.unobs[wunobs.0]$z, log=T) + plogis(gamma0 + gamma_y + gamma_z*df.unobs[wunobs.0]$z + df.unobs[wunobs.0]$z*gamma_yz, lower.tail=FALSE, log=T)
+
+ p.unobs.1[wunobs.1] <- plogis(B0 + Bxy * df.unobs[wunobs.1]$x + Bzy*df.unobs[wunobs.1]$z, log=T, lower.tail=FALSE) + plogis(gamma0 + gamma_z*df.unobs[wunobs.1]$z, log=T)
+
+ p.unobs.1[wunobs.0] <- plogis(B0 + Bxy * df.unobs[wunobs.0]$x + Bzy*df.unobs[wunobs.0]$z, log=T, lower.tail=FALSE) + plogis(gamma0 + gamma_z*df.unobs[wunobs.0]$z, lower.tail=FALSE, log=T)
+
+ p.unobs <- colLogSumExps(rbind(p.unobs.1, p.unobs.0))
+
+ p <- c(p.obs, p.unobs)
+
+ return(-1*(sum(p)))
+ }
+
+ mlefit <- mle2(minuslogl = nll, start = list(B0=0, Bxy=0,Bzy=0, gamma0=0, gamma_y=0, gamma_z=0, gamma_yz=0), control=list(maxit=1e6),method='L-BFGS-B')
+
+ return(mlefit)
+}
+
+run_simulation_depvar <- function(df, result, outcome_formula=y~x+z, proxy_formula=w_pred~y){
+
+ accuracy <- df[,mean(w_pred==y)]
+ result <- append(result, list(accuracy=accuracy))
+
+ (model.true <- glm(y ~ x + z, data=df,family=binomial(link='logit')))
+ true.ci.Bxy <- confint(model.true)['x',]
+ true.ci.Bzy <- confint(model.true)['z',]
+
+ result <- append(result, list(Bxy.est.true=coef(model.true)['x'],
+ Bzy.est.true=coef(model.true)['z'],
+ Bxy.ci.upper.true = true.ci.Bxy[2],
+ Bxy.ci.lower.true = true.ci.Bxy[1],
+ Bzy.ci.upper.true = true.ci.Bzy[2],
+ Bzy.ci.lower.true = true.ci.Bzy[1]))
+
+ (model.feasible <- glm(y.obs~x+z,data=df,family=binomial(link='logit')))
+
+ feasible.ci.Bxy <- confint(model.feasible)['x',]
+ result <- append(result, list(Bxy.est.feasible=coef(model.feasible)['x'],
+ Bxy.ci.upper.feasible = feasible.ci.Bxy[2],
+ Bxy.ci.lower.feasible = feasible.ci.Bxy[1]))
+
+ feasible.ci.Bzy <- confint(model.feasible)['z',]
+ result <- append(result, list(Bzy.est.feasible=coef(model.feasible)['z'],
+ Bzy.ci.upper.feasible = feasible.ci.Bzy[2],
+ Bzy.ci.lower.feasible = feasible.ci.Bzy[1]))
+
+ (model.naive <- glm(w_pred~x+z, data=df, family=binomial(link='logit')))
+
+ naive.ci.Bxy <- confint(model.naive)['x',]
+ naive.ci.Bzy <- confint(model.naive)['z',]
+
+ result <- append(result, list(Bxy.est.naive=coef(model.naive)['x'],
+ Bzy.est.naive=coef(model.naive)['z'],
+ Bxy.ci.upper.naive = naive.ci.Bxy[2],
+ Bxy.ci.lower.naive = naive.ci.Bxy[1],
+ Bzy.ci.upper.naive = naive.ci.Bzy[2],
+ Bzy.ci.lower.naive = naive.ci.Bzy[1]))
+
+
+ (model.naive.cont <- lm(w~x+z, data=df))
+ naivecont.ci.Bxy <- confint(model.naive.cont)['x',]
+ naivecont.ci.Bzy <- confint(model.naive.cont)['z',]
+
+ ## my implementatoin of liklihood based correction
+
+ temp.df <- copy(df)
+ temp.df[,y:=y.obs]
+ mod.caroll.lik <- measerr_mle_dv(temp.df, outcome_formula=outcome_formula, proxy_formula=proxy_formula)
+ fisher.info <- solve(mod.caroll.lik$hessian)
+ coef <- mod.caroll.lik$par
+ ci.upper <- coef + sqrt(diag(fisher.info)) * 1.96
+ ci.lower <- coef - sqrt(diag(fisher.info)) * 1.96
+ result <- append(result,
+ list(Bxy.est.mle = coef['x'],
+ Bxy.ci.upper.mle = ci.upper['x'],
+ Bxy.ci.lower.mle = ci.lower['x'],
+ Bzy.est.mle = coef['z'],
+ Bzy.ci.upper.mle = ci.upper['z'],
+ Bzy.ci.lower.mle = ci.lower['z']))
+
+
+ ## my implementatoin of liklihood based correction
+ mod.zhang <- zhang.mle.dv(df)
+ coef <- coef(mod.zhang)
+ ci <- confint(mod.zhang,method='quad')
+
+ result <- append(result,
+ list(Bxy.est.zhang = coef['Bxy'],
+ Bxy.ci.upper.zhang = ci['Bxy','97.5 %'],
+ Bxy.ci.lower.zhang = ci['Bxy','2.5 %'],
+ Bzy.est.zhang = coef['Bzy'],
+ Bzy.ci.upper.zhang = ci['Bzy','97.5 %'],
+ Bzy.ci.lower.zhang = ci['Bzy','2.5 %']))
+
+
+ # amelia says use normal distribution for binary variables.
+ tryCatch({
+ amelia.out.k <- amelia(df, m=200, p2s=0, idvars=c('y','ystar','w'))
+ mod.amelia.k <- zelig(y.obs~x+z, model='ls', data=amelia.out.k$imputations, cite=FALSE)
+ (coefse <- combine_coef_se(mod.amelia.k, messages=FALSE))
+ est.x.mi <- coefse['x','Estimate']
+ est.x.se <- coefse['x','Std.Error']
+ result <- append(result,
+ list(Bxy.est.amelia.full = est.x.mi,
+ Bxy.ci.upper.amelia.full = est.x.mi + 1.96 * est.x.se,
+ Bxy.ci.lower.amelia.full = est.x.mi - 1.96 * est.x.se
+ ))
+
+ est.z.mi <- coefse['z','Estimate']
+ est.z.se <- coefse['z','Std.Error']
+
+ result <- append(result,
+ list(Bzy.est.amelia.full = est.z.mi,
+ Bzy.ci.upper.amelia.full = est.z.mi + 1.96 * est.z.se,
+ Bzy.ci.lower.amelia.full = est.z.mi - 1.96 * est.z.se
+ ))
+
+ },
+ error = function(e){
+ message("An error occurred:\n",e)
+ result$error <- paste0(result$error,'\n', e)
+ })
+
+
+ return(result)
+
+}
+
+
+## outcome_formula, proxy_formula, and truth_formula are passed to measerr_mle
+run_simulation <- function(df, result, outcome_formula=y~x+z, proxy_formula=w_pred~x, truth_formula=x~z){