+
+
+F1 <- function(y, predictions){
+ tp <- sum( (predictions == y) & (predictions==1))
+ fn <- sum( (predictions != y) & (predictions!=1))
+ fp <- sum( (predictions != y) & (predictions==1))
+ precision <- tp / (tp + fp)
+ recall <- tp / (tp + fn)
+ return (2 * precision * recall ) / (precision + recall)
+}
+
+
+## toxicity is about 93% accurate, with an f1 of 0.8
+## identity_attack has high accuracy 97%, but an unfortunant f1 of 0.5.
+## threat has high accuracy 99%, but a really bad looking f1 of 0.48.
+accuracies <- df[,.(identity_attack_acc = mean(identity_attack_pred == identity_attack_coded),
+ insult_pred_acc = mean(insult_pred == insult_coded),
+ profanity_acc = mean(profanity_pred == profanity_coded),
+ severe_toxicity_acc = mean(severe_toxicity_pred == severe_toxicity_coded),
+ theat_acc = mean(threat_pred == threat_coded),
+ toxicity_acc = mean(toxicity_pred == toxicity_coded))]
+
+f1s <- df[,.(identity_attack_f1 = F1(identity_attack_coded,identity_attack_pred),
+ insult_f1 = F1(insult_coded,insult_pred),
+ profanity_f1 = F1(profanity_coded,profanity_pred),
+ severe_toxicity_f1 = F1(severe_toxicity_coded,severe_toxicity_pred),
+ theat_f1 = F1(threat_coded,threat_pred),
+ toxicity_f1 = F1(toxicity_coded,toxicity_pred))]
+
+positive_cases <- df[,.(identity_attacks = sum(identity_attack_coded),
+ insults = sum(insult_coded),
+ profanities = sum(profanity_coded),
+ severe_toxic_comments = sum(severe_toxicity_coded),
+ threats = sum(threat_coded),
+ toxic_comments = sum(toxicity_coded))]
+
+## there are 50,000 toxic comments, 13000 identity attacks, 30000 insults, 3000 profanities, 8 severe toxic, and 1000 threats.
+
+proportions_cases <- df[,.(prop_identity = mean(identity_attack_coded),
+ prop_insults = mean(insult_coded),
+ prop_profanity = mean(profanity_coded),
+ prop_severe = mean(severe_toxicity_coded),
+ prop_threats = mean(threat_coded),
+ prop_toxic = mean(toxicity_coded))]
+
+## at 11% of comments, "toxicity" seems not so badly skewed. Try toxicity first, and if it doesn't work out try insults.
+
+## now look for an example where differential error affects an identity, or a reaction.
+df <- df[,":="(identity_error = identity_attack_coded - identity_attack_pred,
+ insult_error = insult_coded - insult_pred,
+ profanity_error = profanity_coded - profanity_pred,
+ severe_toxic_error = severe_toxicity_coded - severe_toxicity_pred,
+ threat_error = threat_coded - threat_pred,
+ toxicity_error = toxicity_coded - toxicity_pred)]
+
+## what's correlated with toxicity_error ?
+df <- df[,approved := rating == "approved"]
+df <- df[,white := white > 0.5]
+
+cortab <- cor(df[,.(toxicity_error,
+ identity_error,
+ toxicity_coded,
+ funny,
+ approved,
+ sad,
+ wow,
+ likes,
+ disagree,
+ male,
+ female,
+ transgender,
+ other_gender,
+ heterosexual,
+ bisexual,
+ other_sexual_orientation,
+ christian,
+ jewish,
+ hindu,
+ buddhist,
+ atheist,
+ other_religion,
+ black,
+ white,
+ asian,
+ latino,
+ other_race_or_ethnicity,
+ physical_disability,
+ intellectual_or_learning_disability,
+ psychiatric_or_mental_illness,
+ other_disability,
+ gender_disclosed,
+ sexuality_disclosed,
+ religion_disclosed,
+ race_disclosed,
+ disability_disclosed)])